Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Andrew Tettenborn results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 68.7% saturation with 1,678 hits. Analysis detected 6,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,442 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,215 authors). This Andrew Tettenborn is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Andrew Tettenborn
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Andrew Tettenborn (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,442
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 68.7%68.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 35.7%35.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 28.5%28.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 14.6%14.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.5%14.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.0%5.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Author 68.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 35.7%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 28.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Author 14.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 19.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Straw Man: Author 14.6%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Author 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos