Keyword summary
18% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,739 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jurassic Park results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 2,976 hits . Analysis detected 9,799 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,397 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (35,426 of 36,754 keywords). This Jurassic Park is better (less manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group. Jurassic Park
Keyword details
Total words: 21,397
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.6% percentile 1.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles21.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst