Keyword summary
49% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inflation Reduction Act results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 1,792 hits . Analysis detected 19,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,903 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (34,047 of 37,536 keywords). This Inflation Reduction Act is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group. Inflation Reduction Act
Keyword details
Total words: 26,903
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles26.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst