Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ahmed Aboulenein results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 860 hits . Analysis detected 3,321 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,295 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,264 of 6,348 authors). This Ahmed Aboulenein is worse (more manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group. Ahmed Aboulenein
Author details
Total words: 3,295
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.1% percentile 4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 20.1% 20.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.3% 9.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.6% 3.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 26.1%, sitewide 26.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 20.1%, sitewide 4.0% Negativity Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst