Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nathan Layne results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 149 hits. Analysis detected 858 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,347 authors). This Nathan Layne is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nathan Layne
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Nathan Layne (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,100
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.1%4.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.1%2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 2.8%2.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos