Keyword summary
⁠0%8 analyzed articles/videos7,882 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humanitarian Aid results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 4,092 hits. Analysis detected 36,731 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,096 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (29,143 of 37,536 keywords). This Humanitarian Aid is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Humanitarian Aid
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠23%Humanitarian Aid (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

22% percentile
025507510022.4% percentile
1.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles37.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate