Keyword summary
50% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,756 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House Vote results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,363 hits . Analysis detected 11,084 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,839 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (27,569 of 35,014 keywords). This House Vote is better (less manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group. House Vote
Keyword details
Total words: 12,839
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst