Keyword summary
⁠47%3 analyzed articles/videos189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House Armed Services Committee results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 906 hits. Analysis detected 7,553 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,375 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (21,746 of 37,536 keywords). This House Armed Services Committee is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
House Armed Services Committee
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 7,375
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

42% percentile
025507510042.1% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos