Keyword summary
84%5 analyzed articles/videos1,562 analyzed words
BS Summary: These George Conway results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 2,484 hits. Analysis detected 15,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,051 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,571 of 37,452 keywords). This George Conway is worse (more manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
George Conway
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
64%George Conway (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

64% percentile
025507510063.8% percentile
3.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 24.7%24.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.5%17.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.1%14.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 24.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate