Author summary
83% 4 analyzed articles/videos 778 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dave Goldiner results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 2,026 hits . Analysis detected 10,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,296 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,517 of 6,628 authors). This Dave Goldiner is worse (more manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group. Dave Goldiner
Author details
Total words: 7,296
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.0% percentile 3.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 27.8% 27.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.2% 7.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 22.0% 22.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 27.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 22.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst