How NY lawmakers split on bill to cut aid to Israel 60%

By Dave Goldiner83%

7/16/2026, 6:45:28 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 463 faulty-reasoning hits from 336 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 55.9% and a BS Rank of 60% (8,882 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the article peer group.

New York City-area Democratic lawmakers split on a failed measure that would have cut off all U.S. aid to Israel, which for the first time ever garnered the support of half the Democrats in the House of Representatives. 
With many moderates and longtime backers of Israel switching sides, Hudson Valley Rep. 
Pat Ryan voted in favor of cutting off aid and fiercely denounced the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. 
“Sending $3.3 billion of our taxpayer dollars to Netanyahu’s government (is) wrong on every level,” tweeted Ryan, who had previously received some support from AIPAC. 
“I expect groups like AIPAC will not support me in my future elections and frankly, I don’t want their support.” 
Brooklyn Rep. 
Hakeem Jeffries led the opposition to the move and kept most other local Democrats in line to oppose the amendment, which won 103-98 among Democrats but failed due to overwhelming opposition from Republicans. 
Even Jeffries called the vote a powerful warning sign for the right-wing government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu amid the wars in Gaza, Iran and Lebanon. 
“For the good of Israel and the Palestinian people, American policy in the Middle East must change,” said Jeffries, a strong supporter of Israel who represents several large Jewish communities in Brooklyn. 
Progressives like Rep. 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and retiring Rep. 
Nydia Velazquez voted for the amendment as expected. 
Local Black lawmakers and others representing significant Jewish communities stuck with Israel even as Democrats nationally shifted sharply. 
Lame duck representatives Dan Goldman and Adriano Espaillat, both of whom lost their recent primaries to progressive challengers backed by Mayor Mamdani, opposed the measure, as did Queens Rep. 
Grace Meng, who survived a similar challenge. 
Bronx Rep. 
Ritchie Torres, Rep. 
Greg Meeks of Queens, and Brooklyn’s Rep. 
Yvette Clarke also voted to continue aid to Israel, along with all local Republicans. 
A similar measure in 2024 won the backing of only 37 mostly progressive Democrats, highlighting the major shift within the party. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 2.5%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 3.8%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 4.3%newyorkdailynews: 3.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.4%Dave Goldiner: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.4%This article: 6.3%Dave Goldiner: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 22.3%Dave Goldiner: 22.0%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect22.3%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.4%Dave Goldiner: 16.0%newyorkdailynews: 9.8%Negativity Bias13.4%This article: 6.0%Dave Goldiner: 2.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Dave Goldiner: 2.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Dave Goldiner: 4.4%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Halo Effect9.5%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 2.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 3.7%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.5%Dave Goldiner: 3.7%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority9.5%This article: 9.8%Dave Goldiner: 1.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma9.8%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 4.6%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 8.6%Dave Goldiner: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring8.6%This article: 4.2%Dave Goldiner: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon4.2%This article: 8.0%Dave Goldiner: 3.9%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion8.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 2.9%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.3%Dave Goldiner: 2.7%newyorkdailynews: 3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.3%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 5.4%Dave Goldiner: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division5.4%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 3.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.4%Dave Goldiner: 7.2%newyorkdailynews: 2.1%Unattributed Quote7.4%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 13.4%Dave Goldiner: 27.8%newyorkdailynews: 6.7%Biased Writer Voice13.4%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 4.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Goldiner: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

336 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers53%attributed speech159writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coveragePat Ryan • 18 words • 100.0% coveragePat Ryan • 25 words • 100.0% coveragePat Ryan • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageHakeem Jeffries • 33 words • 0.0% coverageHakeem Jeffries • 27 words • 100.0% coverageHakeem Jeffries • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageNydia Velazquez • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageYvette Clarke • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Hakeem Jeffries

100%flagged-word coverage
92 attributed words52% of attributed speech43% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice+29.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Hakeem Jeffries: 29.3%29.3%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.