Keyword summary
57%7 analyzed articles/videos4,150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gaming Industry results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 2,996 hits. Analysis detected 23,654 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,380 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,848 of 37,536 keywords). This Gaming Industry is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Gaming Industry
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
56%Gaming Industry (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

55% percentile
025507510055.1% percentile
3.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles17.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate