Keyword summary
35% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,362 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food And Drug Administration results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 656 hits . Analysis detected 7,287 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,737 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (32,262 of 37,536 keywords). This Food And Drug Administration is better (less manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group. Food And Drug Administration
Keyword details
Total words: 10,737
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst