Author summary
43% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megan Cerullo results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Availability Heuristic , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 475 hits . Analysis detected 4,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,926 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,927 of 6,628 authors). This Megan Cerullo is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Megan Cerullo
Author details
Total words: 5,926
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.8% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.8% 4.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.6%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst