1.6 million eggs are recalled over potential salmonella contamination 5%

By Megan Cerullo43%

7/24/2026, 12:26:24 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Unattributed Quote, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 207 faulty-reasoning hits from 290 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 20.5% and a BS Rank of 5% (20,818 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.10% of the article peer group.

Midwest Poultry Services is recalling 1.6 million eggs over concerns that they could be contaminated with salmonella, the Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday. 
The recall covers white-shell and cage-free shell eggs produced at the company's Texas farms and distributed to retailers in six states. 
Salmonella Enteritidis can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in vulnerable populations such as young children or older adults. 
Symptoms in otherwise healthy people can include fever, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting. 
The recalled eggs from Texas farms were produced and distributed to customers across six states between June 6 and July 3, according to the FDA's recall notice. 
Their sell-by or best-by dates are between July 20 and Aug. 17, and they were sold under multiple brand names, including Kroger, Simple Truth, Brookshire's, Country Morning and Sunups. 
Here's where the recalled eggs were sold: 
Arkansas: Brookshire Grocery storesLouisiana: Kroger, Brookshire Grocery storesMississippi: Brookshire Grocery storesNew Mexico: Brookshire Grocery storesOklahoma: Brookshire Grocery storesTexas: Kroger, Brookshire Grocery stores 
The eggs were also sold at other smaller retail outlets, according to the FDA, which said that no other products for the poultry firm are part of the latest recall. 
No illnesses have been reported related to the eggs, according to Midwest Poultry Services. 
How did it uncover the issue? 
The firm identified the issue through what it described as "proactive environmental monitoring practices and root cause analysis" on its two Texas farms. 
It has since paused the distribution of any fresh eggs produced at the farms. 
Consumers should not eat the recalled eggs and should return them to the place of purchase for a full refund. 
A complete list of affected products is available in the FDA's recall notice. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 3.2%Associated Press: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 2.2%Associated Press: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 5.2%Associated Press: 2.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 2.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 1.0%Associated Press: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 3.8%Associated Press: 5.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 6.9%Megan Cerullo: 1.5%Associated Press: 0.8%Loss Aversion6.9%This article: 4.8%Megan Cerullo: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.5%Status Quo Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.8%Megan Cerullo: 2.3%Associated Press: 1.7%Optimism Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 1.3%Associated Press: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 17.6%Megan Cerullo: 8.0%Associated Press: 7.3%Negativity Bias17.6%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 2.7%Associated Press: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.9%Associated Press: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 1.8%Associated Press: 3.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 1.2%Associated Press: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.9%Megan Cerullo: 4.4%Associated Press: 4.1%Appeal to Authority7.9%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 1.3%Associated Press: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 3.7%Associated Press: 3.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.6%Megan Cerullo: 3.8%Associated Press: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion6.6%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 3.2%Associated Press: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 6.6%Associated Press: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 2.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.9%Associated Press: 1.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 1.5%Associated Press: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.9%Megan Cerullo: 2.6%Associated Press: 2.0%Unattributed Quote7.9%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 3.3%Associated Press: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.9%Megan Cerullo: 2.2%Associated Press: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice7.9%This article: 6.9%Megan Cerullo: 4.8%Associated Press: 1.8%Indoctrination6.9%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Megan Cerullo: 0.4%Associated Press: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

290 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker4.8%attributed speech276writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageMidwest Poultry Services • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
14 attributed words100% of attributed speech32% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Unattributed Quote-8.3 ptsWriter: 8.3%Midwest Poultry Services: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.3 ptsWriter: 8.3%Midwest Poultry Services: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-7.2 ptsWriter: 7.2%Midwest Poultry Services: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.