Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Marjorie Dannenfelser results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Begging the Question , and Framing Effect , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 411 hits . Analysis detected 2,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,655 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Marjorie Dannenfelser is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Marjorie Dannenfelser
Author details
Total words: 2,655
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.7% 2.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 15.5% 15.5% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 10.5% 10.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.8% 11.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.8%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 15.5%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Author 10.5%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 7.6%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Horn Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.1% Straw Man: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst