Keyword summary
78% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,266 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Access results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 1,177 hits . Analysis detected 8,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,428 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,077 of 36,903 keywords). This Food Access is better (less manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group. Food Access
Keyword details
Total words: 8,428
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst