Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,499 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fidel Castro results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 1,760 hits . Analysis detected 14,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,996 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (29,995 of 35,718 keywords). This Fidel Castro is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group. Fidel Castro
Keyword details
Total words: 17,996
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles18K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst