Keyword summary
38% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,847 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ferran Torres results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 1,886 hits . Analysis detected 8,744 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,541 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 27% (27,715 of 37,536 keywords). This Ferran Torres is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group. Ferran Torres
Keyword details
Total words: 11,541
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.3% 16.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst