Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 986 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ferdinand Marcos Jr results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 1,022 hits . Analysis detected 4,534 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,516 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (20,749 of 34,534 keywords). This Ferdinand Marcos Jr is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Ferdinand Marcos Jr
Keyword details
Total words: 5,516
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.9% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst