Keyword summary
66% 9 analyzed articles/videos 8,014 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Agents results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 3,406 hits . Analysis detected 25,851 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,069 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,040 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Agents is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group. Federal Agents
Keyword details
Total words: 31,069
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score9 analyzed articles31.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst