Keyword summary
76% 12 analyzed articles/videos 10,184 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Farming results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 5,525 hits . Analysis detected 39,109 faulty-reasoning hits from 50,276 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (32,613 of 35,444 keywords). This Farming is better (less manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group. Farming
Keyword details
Total words: 50,276
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score12 analyzed articles50.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst