Keyword summary
20%4 analyzed articles/videos719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Farm Aid results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 1,582 hits. Analysis detected 9,851 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,328 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,287 of 37,536 keywords). This Farm Aid is better (less manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group.
Farm Aid
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
12%Farm Aid (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 15,328
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

11% percentile
025507510011.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate