Keyword summary
29%6 analyzed articles/videos1,592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eminent Domain results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,313 hits. Analysis detected 8,889 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,118 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,917 of 37,536 keywords). This Eminent Domain is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Eminent Domain
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
34%Eminent Domain (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

34% percentile
025507510033.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 14.4%14.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.4%13.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate