Keyword summary
89%16 analyzed articles/videos6,156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Interference results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 8,198 hits. Analysis detected 68,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,273 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 57% (15,120 of 34,588 keywords). This Election Interference is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Election Interference

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510056.3% percentile
3.1% BS Score16 analyzed articles41.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 16.9%16.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Fact-checking Mullin’s claim that foreign adversaries can access voting machines20%
PolitiFact3%By Loreben Tuquero31%7/22/2026, 10:25:36 PM
Trump gutted the agency built to stop election interference68%
MS NOW94%By Laura Barrón-López79%7/22/2026, 10:00:00 AM
Senators Never Asked Blanche the Most Obvious Epstein Question (w/ Andrew Weissmann)92%
The Bulwark72%By Sarah Longwell92%7/18/2026, 9:37:49 PM
Deep State crawls out of the woodwork: Meet former FBI executive Nikki Floris78%
American Thinker93%By Monica Showalter93%7/18/2026, 12:00:00 AM
Trump’s Plan for November Is Failing80%
The Atlantic98%By David A. Graham95%7/17/2026, 4:33:00 PM
Trump’s Primetime Speech Was a Dud. He Could Still Use it to Interfere in the Midterms.78%
Mother Jones50%By Ari Berman0%7/17/2026, 2:26:23 PM
‘Scary’: Jim Acosta flags chilling detail in Trump’s ‘deranged dictator speech’83%
Raw Story93%By Alexander Willis88%7/17/2026, 1:00:02 PM
Key Takeaways From Donald Trump’s Speech Debunked64%
Newsweek32%By Anna Commander31%7/17/2026, 8:02:34 AM
Trump: China Accessed 220 Million US Voter Files, Deep State Hid Evidence80%
The Daily Signal82%By Fred Lucas0%7/17/2026, 2:00:23 AM
Fact-checking Trump’s address: What he said about China and 2020 election, what documents show30%
PolitiFact3%By Louis Jacobson15%7/16/2026, 10:07:05 PM