Keyword summary
⁠86%4 analyzed articles/videos2,362 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic Nomination results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 706 hits. Analysis detected 6,661 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,916 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (23,939 of 37,536 keywords). This Democratic Nomination is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
Democratic Nomination
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠37%Democratic Nomination (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,916
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

36% percentile
025507510036.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos