Keyword summary
61% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense Minister results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,341 hits . Analysis detected 11,556 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,784 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,585 of 37,536 keywords). This Defense Minister is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group. Defense Minister
Keyword details
Total words: 10,784
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst