Keyword summary
⁠62%5 analyzed articles/videos821 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Lammy results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 2,269 hits. Analysis detected 17,243 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,895 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (20,959 of 35,668 keywords). This David Lammy is better (less manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
David Lammy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠42%David Lammy (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

41% percentile
025507510041.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos