Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David-Ellison results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Negativity Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 422 hits . Analysis detected 3,213 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (12,831 of 35,153 keywords). This David-Ellison is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. David-Ellison
Keyword details
Total words: 3,140
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.5% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst