Keyword summary
73% 10 analyzed articles/videos 6,286 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dating results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 3,465 hits . Analysis detected 29,243 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,766 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (31,572 of 37,536 keywords). This Dating is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Dating
Keyword details
Total words: 32,766
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score10 analyzed articles32.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst