Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emma Loffhagen results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 715 hits . Analysis detected 4,502 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,229 of 6,628 authors). This Emma Loffhagen is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group. Emma Loffhagen
Author details
Total words: 5,332
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.3% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.1% 11.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.4% 13.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst