Harriette Cole: My beloved great-aunt stayed silent when I was insulted 41%

By Harriette Cole52%

7/14/2026, 8:57:41 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Optimism Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 793 faulty-reasoning hits from 598 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.4% and a BS Rank of 41% (13,056 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 59.70% of the article peer group.

DEAR HARRIETTE: My great-aunt is in heart failure and was told she has less than a year to live. 
Growing up, we had an amazing relationship, and she introduced me, as a little gay boy, to cosmetics; she would paint my nails and let me play with her makeup. 
I wrote my college entrance essay on her and how she helped me fall in love with makeup. 
I have love for her and amazing memories, but we haven’t spoken in years. 
At my great-grandmother's funeral, my great-aunt's daughter and grandchildren made homophobic remarks toward me. 
My great-aunt didn't say anything, which was extremely hurtful as I was only 16. 
As a result, my immediate family doesn't speak to any of them. 
I want to see her before she passes, but I don't know how to go about it. 
I don't want it to feel awkward. 
What should I do? 
 Weird Family Dynamic 
DEAR WEIRD FAMILY DYNAMIC: You should go visit your great-aunt. 
Be in her company and thank her for seeing you for who you were when you were growing up. 
Remind her of how affirming she was to you and how much you valued that, because she didn't judge you. 
Let her know in person how grateful you are for her love and support. 
You don't need to mention how her family behaved and their negative comments. 
She has no control over them and probably felt it would be awkward to say anything in the emotional setting of a funeral. 
Regardless, she was there for you at a pivotal time in your young life. 
Remind her of how important that was to you. 
DEAR HARRIETTE: I’m at a point in my life where I want to be in an exclusive, long-term relationship. 
I have been dating and have not been able to find that. 
A friend of mine suggested I try dating more casually. 
He urged me to just enjoy myself  whether the person turns out to be my husband should be the least of my concerns. 
So lately, I’ve tried it his way. 
Someone I’ve known peripherally for about 10 years asked me on a date recently, and with my friend's advice, I actually had a great time. 
Though I am still talking to other people, he and I have been rather steady and see each other consistently. 
Despite that, though, I was still surprised when he invited me to join him and his friends on his birthday trip next month. 
Normally, I’d be wondering how serious we really are for us to be traveling together. 
But now, a part of me is wondering if it's OK to just have fun abroad. 
Should I take him up on his offer or stay home and wait for our connection to grow when he returns? 
 Cautious or Casual 
DEAR CAUTIOUS OR CASUAL: It sounds like you like this guy. 
Why not go on the trip with him and his friends? 
It doesn’t have to mean you are exclusive, though it is clear that he is interested enough to choose you to be his companion on the trip. 
You can also ask him what it means to him about your relationship that he has invited you. 
See where that conversation leads so you are clear about his intentions. 
Harriette Cole is a lifestylist and founder of DREAMLEAPERS, an initiative to help people access and activate their dreams. 
You can send questions to askharriette@harriettecole.com or c/o Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.4%Harriette Cole: 3.2%East Bay Times: 2.9%Confirmation Bias7.4%This article: 2.5%Harriette Cole: 0.5%East Bay Times: 0.3%Anchoring Bias2.5%This article: 3.8%Harriette Cole: 2.2%East Bay Times: 2.6%Availability Heuristic3.8%This article: 1.8%Harriette Cole: 0.5%East Bay Times: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic1.8%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.2%East Bay Times: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Harriette Cole: 1.0%East Bay Times: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias1.7%This article: 1.3%Harriette Cole: 0.8%East Bay Times: 3.5%Framing Effect1.3%This article: 2.8%Harriette Cole: 0.5%East Bay Times: 0.5%Loss Aversion2.8%This article: 2.2%Harriette Cole: 0.2%East Bay Times: 0.4%Status Quo Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 1.5%East Bay Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.5%Harriette Cole: 3.1%East Bay Times: 2.0%Optimism Bias8.5%This article: 3.2%Harriette Cole: 2.0%East Bay Times: 1.3%Pessimism Bias3.2%This article: 4.7%Harriette Cole: 7.5%East Bay Times: 7.9%Negativity Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 2.5%East Bay Times: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 4.7%East Bay Times: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 3.8%Harriette Cole: 1.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.2%East Bay Times: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.2%East Bay Times: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Harriette Cole: 1.1%East Bay Times: 7.7%Halo Effect6.5%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.3%Harriette Cole: 0.8%East Bay Times: 0.8%Recency Bias2.3%This article: 3.8%Harriette Cole: 0.8%East Bay Times: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.8%This article: 2.7%Harriette Cole: 0.9%East Bay Times: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.4%East Bay Times: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.2%Harriette Cole: 1.0%East Bay Times: 2.5%Appeal to Authority3.2%This article: 11.5%Harriette Cole: 4.2%East Bay Times: 1.1%False Dilemma11.5%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.0%Harriette Cole: 3.2%East Bay Times: 3.4%Hasty Generalization2.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.2%Harriette Cole: 0.2%East Bay Times: 0.2%Bandwagon1.2%This article: 3.3%Harriette Cole: 1.2%East Bay Times: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion3.3%This article: 3.5%Harriette Cole: 0.7%East Bay Times: 0.5%Begging the Question3.5%This article: 3.8%Harriette Cole: 1.6%East Bay Times: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.8%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.2%Harriette Cole: 0.8%East Bay Times: 2.3%Anecdotal4.2%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.5%Harriette Cole: 1.4%East Bay Times: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.5%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.4%East Bay Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 1.2%East Bay Times: 1.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.8%Harriette Cole: 1.9%East Bay Times: 8.1%Biased Writer Voice3.8%This article: 21.1%Harriette Cole: 14.3%East Bay Times: 2.8%Indoctrination21.1%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Harriette Cole: 2.2%East Bay Times: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.2%

598 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.