Keyword summary
32% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Sullivan results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 1,182 hits . Analysis detected 7,462 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,312 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (29,109 of 36,177 keywords). This Dan Sullivan is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group. Dan Sullivan
Keyword details
Total words: 9,312
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst