Newsmax75%

Rep. Luna to Newsmax: Alaska Duplicate Sullivan Scheme Shows Dem 'Cunning' 74%

By Jim Thomas0%

6/17/2026, 1:57:20 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 659 faulty-reasoning hits from 438 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 66.2% and a BS Rank of 74% (5,701 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 74.00% of the article peer group.

Rep. 
Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., told Newsmax on Tuesday that the disqualification of a same-name Republican challenger to Sen. 
Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, exposes a pattern of Democrat election gamesmanship and underscores why federal voter ID legislation must clear the Senate. 
Appearing on "Rob Schmitt Tonight," Luna seized on the Alaska ruling as fresh evidence of a recurring problem. 
"Yeah. 
Look, it's completely not right that they're doing that," she said. 
"But then again, every single day, you know, we have one of these issues." 
Alaska Division of Elections Director Carol Beecher ruled Monday that Dan J. 
Sullivan, a retired teacher from Petersburg, cannot appear on the Aug. 18 primary ballot, concluding his declaration of candidacy "was not filed in order to declare an actual good-faith candidacy" but "with a purpose to confuse or mislead" voters. 
Beecher cited his registration as a Republican two days before filing, a campaign website mirroring the incumbent's color scheme and launch-release metadata identifying a Democrat consultant as the author. 
He has 30 days to appeal. 
Ballots print June 28. 
Sen. 
Sullivan now faces former Rep. 
Mary Peltola, D-Alaska, in one of the cycle's most-watched Senate contests, run under Alaska's top-four nonpartisan primary and ranked-choice general election. 
Public polling has consistently shown a competitive race. 
An Alaska Survey Research poll fielded March 19-22 found Peltola leading Sullivan 52.4%-47.6% in a third-round ranked-choice simulation, with the former congresswoman up 48.8%-43.5% in the first round. 
The survey of 1,590 Alaska adults, including 1,340 general election voters, carried a margin of error of 2.5 to 3.0 percentage points. 
Luna closed with a sharper indictment. 
"So I'm not surprised by that. 
But, you know, unfortunately, Democrats are very cunning in how they do try to interfere in elections," she said. 
"And what I will say is that we need voter ID to be the top issue in the country." 
GET TODAY NEWSMAX+: 
NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America with more than 30 million people watching! 
You need to watch NEWSMAX today. 
Get it with great shows from Rob Schmitt, Greta Van Susteren, Greg Kelly, Carl Higbie, Rob Finnerty  and many more! 
Find the NEWSMAX channel on your cable system  Go Here Now 
BEST OFFER: 
Sign up for NEWSMAX+ and get NEWSMAX, our streaming channel NEWSMAX2 and our military channel World at War. 
Find hundreds of shows, movies and specials. 
Even get Jon Voight's special series and President Trump's comedy programs and much more! 
Watch NEWSMAX+ on your smartphone or home TV app. 
Watch NEWSMAX anytime, anywhere! 
Start your FREE trial now: NewsmaxPlus.com 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.2%Jim Thomas: 3.7%Newsmax: 3.4%Confirmation Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.9%Newsmax: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Jim Thomas: 2.6%Newsmax: 3.2%Availability Heuristic6.8%This article: 6.4%Jim Thomas: 1.1%Newsmax: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic6.4%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.2%Newsmax: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 3.7%Newsmax: 3.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 11.4%Jim Thomas: 9.3%Newsmax: 11.0%Framing Effect11.4%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.9%Newsmax: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.8%Jim Thomas: 1.4%Newsmax: 0.9%Status Quo Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 6.3%Newsmax: 4.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 1.3%Newsmax: 2.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Jim Thomas: 10.1%Newsmax: 10.3%Negativity Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 2.9%Newsmax: 3.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.5%Newsmax: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.6%Newsmax: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Jim Thomas: 2.2%Newsmax: 2.7%In-Group Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 1.0%Newsmax: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Jim Thomas: 1.1%Newsmax: 2.0%Halo Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.9%Jim Thomas: 2.0%Newsmax: 1.9%Recency Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.1%Newsmax: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.8%Newsmax: 1.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.9%Jim Thomas: 6.0%Newsmax: 4.8%Appeal to Authority8.9%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 2.7%Newsmax: 2.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.6%Newsmax: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.6%Jim Thomas: 3.4%Newsmax: 4.2%Hasty Generalization14.6%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.4%Newsmax: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.7%Jim Thomas: 0.6%Newsmax: 0.5%Bandwagon3.7%This article: 8.9%Jim Thomas: 6.5%Newsmax: 6.0%Appeal to Emotion8.9%This article: 4.3%Jim Thomas: 1.6%Newsmax: 1.1%Begging the Question4.3%This article: 4.8%Jim Thomas: 3.5%Newsmax: 3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.8%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.4%Newsmax: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.1%Newsmax: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.2%Newsmax: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.1%Jim Thomas: 0.9%Newsmax: 0.9%Anecdotal4.1%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.1%Newsmax: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.9%Jim Thomas: 1.2%Newsmax: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.9%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.2%Newsmax: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.2%Newsmax: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.1%Newsmax: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.5%Jim Thomas: 2.4%Newsmax: 3.1%Unattributed Quote2.5%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 1.7%Newsmax: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 12.1%Jim Thomas: 2.9%Newsmax: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice12.1%This article: 5.7%Jim Thomas: 0.4%Newsmax: 1.0%Indoctrination5.7%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.2%Newsmax: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Thomas: 0.5%Newsmax: 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 26.9%Jim Thomas: 1.8%Newsmax: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…26.9%

438 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers38%attributed speech270writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageAnna Paulina Luna • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageAnna Paulina Luna • 1 words • 0.0% coverageAnna Paulina Luna • 11 words • 100.0% coverageAnna Paulina Luna • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAlaska Division of Elections • 12 words • 0.0% coverageCarol Beecher • 39 words • 0.0% coverageCarol Beecher • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageAnna Paulina Luna • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAnna Paulina Luna • 19 words • 100.0% coverageAnna Paulina Luna • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Anna Paulina Luna

78%flagged-word coverage
88 attributed words52% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -43.7 ptsWriter: 43.7%Anna Paulina Luna: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+19.4 ptsWriter: 2.2%Anna Paulina Luna: 21.6%21.6%Biased Writer Voice+9.0 ptsWriter: 12.6%Anna Paulina Luna: 21.6%21.6%Unattributed Quote+12.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Anna Paulina Luna: 12.5%12.5%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.