Keyword summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,448 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Goldman results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 3,441 hits . Analysis detected 24,608 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,368 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,980 of 37,536 keywords). This Dan Goldman is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group. Dan Goldman
Keyword details
Total words: 18,368
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.4% percentile 2.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles18.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.7% 18.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.9% 15.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst