Keyword summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos2,448 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Goldman results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 3,441 hits. Analysis detected 24,608 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,368 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,980 of 37,536 keywords). This Dan Goldman is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Dan Goldman
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
50%Dan Goldman (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

49% percentile
025507510049.4% percentile
2.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles18.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 18.7%18.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.9%15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate