Breitbart81%

VIDEO: NY Mayor Mamdani Jumps Fully Clothed into Public Pool Then Demands Apology from Top Republican 87%

By Lowell Cauffiel0%

6/28/2026, 11:39:48 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 65.1% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 1,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 416 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 78.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (3,023 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 86.20% of the article peer group.

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, fully dressed in a suit, jumped into a public pool in East Harlem on Saturday to celebrate the anniversary of the city’s pool program but also found himself swimming in the murky waters of antisemitism surrounding the state’s recent primary. 
The mayor took the bizarre plunge into the Thomas Jefferson pool to celebrate the 90th anniversary of the city’s outdoor pool construction program under the old Works Progress Administration. 
However, the cable news network also reported that “the spectacle was quickly overshadowed by a fiery clash with a top New York Republican.” 
The network described the feel-good event as turning “political” by remarks the new mayor apparently made at the location, according to Fox News. 
“…the celebratory splash quickly turned political as Mamdani targeted New York GOP gubernatorial candidate and Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman, demanding an apology for recent comments Blakeman made about Democratic Socialists of America-backed congressional candidate Brad Lander,” Fox News reported. 
Lander is Jewish but in Blakeman’s view, he is an antisemite. 
Following Lander’s 10th congressional district primary victory over incumbent Dan Goldman, who is also Jewish, Blakeman said in a Newsmax interview that Lander was “a disgrace” and “would be a camp guard in a concentration camp if he could. 
” 
All three of the victorious Democratic Socialist candidates that Mamdani endorsed in the primary have made it clear they do not support Israel, with one of them, Darializa Avila Chevalier, supporting the Palestinians and accusing the Jewish state of “genocide. 
” 
The mayor came to Lander’s defense, calling him a “proud Jewish New Yorker” and describing Blakeman’s comments as “unacceptable and unconscionable. 
” 
Mamdani added that he thought likening Lander to a Nazi prison guard was “disgusting” and claimed it was typical of the Republican Party to be fighting to “dehumanize anyone they disagree with. 
” 
Blakeman fired back in an interview with Fox News Digital on Saturday afternoon. 
“This is coming from the same guy who wouldn’t march in the Israel Day Parade, called AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs Committee] members ‘monsters,’ and canceled the Puerto Rican Day Breakfast,” Blakeman told the outlet. 
“Zohran Mamdani has no credibility. 
He is a bigot, an antisemite, and anti-American. 
” 
Breitbart News contributor Lowell Cauffiel is the best-selling author of the Los Angeles crime novel Below the Line and nine other crime novels and nonfiction titles. 
See lowellcauffiel.com for more. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 1.7%Breitbart: 4.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.8%Lowell Cauffiel: 4.1%Breitbart: 3.9%Availability Heuristic11.8%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 1.2%Breitbart: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.6%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 55.3%Lowell Cauffiel: 29.1%Breitbart: 11.9%Framing Effect55.3%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 1.1%Breitbart: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 1.1%Breitbart: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 1.1%Breitbart: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 65.1%Lowell Cauffiel: 17.1%Breitbart: 9.7%Negativity Bias65.1%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.9%Breitbart: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Lowell Cauffiel: 1.8%Breitbart: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error2.6%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%Lowell Cauffiel: 4.1%Breitbart: 4.7%In-Group Bias10.3%This article: 9.6%Lowell Cauffiel: 3.7%Breitbart: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias9.6%This article: 5.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.7%Breitbart: 3.1%Halo Effect5.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.4%Breitbart: 1.8%Recency Bias3.1%This article: 9.4%Lowell Cauffiel: 1.6%Breitbart: 0.6%Primacy Effect9.4%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.8%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 11.5%Lowell Cauffiel: 9.0%Breitbart: 2.9%Ad Hominem11.5%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.3%Lowell Cauffiel: 3.2%Breitbart: 4.2%Appeal to Authority6.3%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 1.1%Breitbart: 2.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 17.3%Lowell Cauffiel: 9.6%Breitbart: 7.9%Hasty Generalization17.3%This article: 11.1%Lowell Cauffiel: 2.8%Breitbart: 0.6%Red Herring11.1%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 40.1%Lowell Cauffiel: 8.1%Breitbart: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion40.1%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 1.2%Breitbart: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 2.3%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.5%Breitbart: 2.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.1%Lowell Cauffiel: 2.1%Breitbart: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.1%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 14.9%Lowell Cauffiel: 5.2%Breitbart: 2.8%Unattributed Quote14.9%This article: 10.8%Lowell Cauffiel: 6.4%Breitbart: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection10.8%This article: 45.2%Lowell Cauffiel: 14.6%Breitbart: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice45.2%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 8.7%Breitbart: 7.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Lowell Cauffiel: 2.4%Breitbart: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.0%

416 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers21%attributed speech329writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageBlakebeman • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageBruce Blakeman • 35 words • 0.0% coverageBruce Blakeman • 5 words • 100.0% coverageBruce Blakeman • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Blakebeman

100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words45% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+93.0 ptsWriter: 7.0%Blakebeman: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+57.1 ptsWriter: 42.9%Blakebeman: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection-12.2 ptsWriter: 12.2%Blakebeman: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.2 ptsWriter: 1.2%Blakebeman: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.