Keyword summary
8% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,776 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cubs results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 3.8% saturation with 509 hits . Analysis detected 5,408 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,399 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (36,906 of 37,536 keywords). This Cubs is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group. Cubs
Keyword details
Total words: 13,399
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.7% percentile 1.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst