Author summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video887 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vinnie Duber results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 1,258 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,661 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (4,313 of 6,361 authors). This Vinnie Duber is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Vinnie Duber
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠33%Vinnie Duber (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,661
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

32% percentile
025507510032.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 10.9%10.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 4.0%4.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos