Keyword summary
34%4 analyzed articles/videos1,604 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crown Prosecution Service results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 769 hits. Analysis detected 5,883 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,740 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (27,666 of 34,832 keywords). This Crown Prosecution Service is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Crown Prosecution Service
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
21%Crown Prosecution Service (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

21% percentile
025507510020.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate