Keyword summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,512 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Counter Terrorism results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 5,137 hits . Analysis detected 37,405 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,104 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (18,928 of 34,040 keywords). This Counter Terrorism is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group. Counter Terrorism
Keyword details
Total words: 28,104
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.4% percentile 2.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles28.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 18.3% 18.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst