Keyword summary
65% 14 analyzed articles/videos 6,053 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Protection results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 4,420 hits . Analysis detected 38,496 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,772 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (24,362 of 34,832 keywords). This Consumer Protection is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. Consumer Protection
Keyword details
Total words: 34,772
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score14 analyzed articles34.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
WAMU 15% 7/14/2026, 12:52:24 PM