Author summary
33%1 analyzed article/video569 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prajwal Bhat results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 396 hits. Analysis detected 1,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,673 of 6,218 authors). This Prajwal Bhat is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Prajwal Bhat
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
57%Prajwal Bhat (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,276
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

57% percentile
025507510057.0% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 17.4%17.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.4%7.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 17.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos