Keyword summary
27% 4 analyzed articles/videos 7,624 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consciousness results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 2,245 hits . Analysis detected 20,988 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,750 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (31,497 of 34,833 keywords). This Consciousness is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group. Consciousness
Keyword details
Total words: 28,750
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles28.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.0% 0.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst