Keyword summary
49% 6 analyzed articles/videos 9,213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Computing results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 2,467 hits . Analysis detected 33,593 faulty-reasoning hits from 45,542 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (34,964 of 37,536 keywords). This Computing is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group. Computing
Keyword details
Total words: 45,542
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles45.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst