Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sarah Marsh results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Indoctrination , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 1,250 hits . Analysis detected 5,991 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,367 authors). This Sarah Marsh is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Sarah Marsh
Author details
Total words: 6,780
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 18.4% 18.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.2% 4.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.5% 11.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 18.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst