Keyword summary
10% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,980 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Computer Science results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 300 hits . Analysis detected 3,604 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,148 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (31,213 of 36,718 keywords). This Computer Science is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group. Computer Science
Keyword details
Total words: 6,148
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst