Keyword summary
17%9 analyzed articles/videos7,526 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cocaine results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 3,817 hits. Analysis detected 34,813 faulty-reasoning hits from 53,380 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (33,869 of 35,444 keywords). This Cocaine is better (less manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group.
Cocaine
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
5%Cocaine (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

4% percentile
02550751004.4% percentile
1.3% BS Score9 analyzed articles53.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.2%7.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate