Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos994 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Cooper results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 906 hits. Analysis detected 7,551 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,488 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (18,408 of 34,040 keywords). This Christopher Cooper is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Christopher Cooper
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Bastille Day1%
0%Radio Broadcasts1%
0%Metropolitan Opera1%
0%Borders1%
0%French Revolution1%
46%Christopher Cooper (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

46% percentile
025507510045.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.9%9.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate