Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,030 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Bordelon results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,022 hits. Analysis detected 5,142 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,120 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (30,207 of 37,536 keywords). This Chris Bordelon is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Chris Bordelon
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
20%Chris Bordelon (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,120
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510019.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.6%12.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos