Keyword summary
â 0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,583 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrity Wedding results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,616 hits . Analysis detected 11,565 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,332 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of â 17% (29,556 of 35,597 keywords). This Celebrity Wedding is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group. Celebrity Wedding
Keyword details
Total words: 14,332
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst